Thursday, March 1, 2007

Chapters 2 & 4

My summary and comment on Chapters 2 & 4 of Technology in its Place: Successful Technology Infusion in Schools:

Chapter 2: Curriculum Planning for Technology-Rich Instruction

The chapter opens with a discussion of technology planning. LeBaron notes that "the systematic improvement of learning, teaching, and curriculum depends not only on the presence of an effective plan, but also on the participation of many stakeholders in the design and execution of the plan" (LeBaron, 2001, p. 17). I do think there can be a risk of "too many cooks in the kitchen" when everbody is making decisions, however in the sense of technology and education, I have to agree with the author that the more stakeholders get involved (teachers, admins, parents, etc), the better the chances that the integration will be focused and will succeed.

LeBaron goes on to say that planning for the integration of technology is a six-stage, progressively narrowing process:

  • Create a shared vision
  • Assess curriculum needs
  • Describe goals and outputs
  • Define key inputs
  • Assign responsibilities
  • Evaluating and assessing results (LeBaron, 2001, p. 19)
The next key point that LeBaron makes is one I really support: "budgeting should be the consequence, not the instigator, of planning" (LeBaron, 2001, p. 19). This is backwards from the way that many schools determine their technology budgeting, and that is the reason a lot of schools fail to meet their technological potential. You have to determine needs first, then once you know exactly what you needs are, budget accordingly so that you can meet your goals. I think a lot of schools would argue that this is unrealistic given the realities of funding, however I do not think they can argue with the need to define needs so you can set clearly defined goals.

The rest if the chapter elaborates on the six-stage process mentioned above, and closes with a list of resources for technology planning in the curriculum. Ultimately this chapter is a good reference for schools looking to develop a plan for technology integration.

Chapter 4: Technology and Learning: Getting the Story Out

Chapter 4 discusses how learning in the technological age is more than memorization. This is at the heart of the Teaching and Designing for Understanding concept, that students should be actively involved in lessons and build knowledge by exploring, collaborating, and asking questions. A key point mentioned is that technology itself doesn't improve learning or thinking, it is the teachers who use their creativity to make technology work to it's potential (Jarvela, 2001).

Motivation is the next area discussed, which is at the heart of any engaging, enriching lesson. The author Jarvela tells how technology can be used in a myriad of ways to support and enhance student motivation. A lot of this chapter to me seems to be a plea to the public and the "powers that be" to embrace technology and sell the idea that it is the future of education. The first two sentences of the conclusion seems to support this assertion:

"Why should the public invest its scarce resources in technology for education? Perhaps a more relevant question would be to ask how we can support the development of students' knowledge and skill to cope in a changing society." (Jarvela, 2001, p. 54)

Translation: If we don't financially support technology in our schools, how can we expect them to compete in the changing technological real-world?

Resources:

Jarvela, S. (2001). Technology and Learning: Getting the Story Out. In Collier, C. & LeBaron, J.F. (Eds.). Technology in its Place: Successful Technology Infusion in Schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.

LeBaron, J. (2001). Curriculum Planning for Technology-Rich Instruction. In Collier, C. & LeBaron, J.F. (Eds.). Technology in its Place: Successful Technology Infusion in Schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.

4 comments:

Teresa Coffman said...

Agreed, there can be too many people involved in making a decision but if everyone is not on board with the new plan - it will fail. So, involvement in this process helps prevent failure. Many times, failure of technology in our schools is due to not enough buy in.

We can have it but not use it. We have it but it does not work properly. We had training but it really made no sense when I got back to my classroom…oh, the list can go on. Some way we need to elicit buy in from the beginning. Yes, I have to agree with the author on this as well.

I like the idea of a shared vision. Even in our class we have a vision but it is not shared. How can we get a shared vision? What strategies can each of us try to begin applying some of these strategies in our classrooms – and at the same time meet our SOLs?

Claudia Trace said...

I Completely agree, all the staff in school needs to be on board with incorporating technology in their curriculum. That does not mean that everyone is making the decisions. I believe that there should be a group of people that make the decision with a concesus from the entire staff. Everyone needs to work together and have a plan on where to begin. I think that every grade level team should come up with a vision for their grade and what they plan to accomplish and share this vision with the school. I also think that the school needs to come up with a vision and goals that will lead the school to technology integration.

Scott Barber said...

The only catch I think when it comes to getting everybody involved is time. The more people we have to survey and question, the longer the process takes.

I agree 100% schools should come together with a plan and have goals...and I would much rather our media center and Tech people buy what we need (with teacher input of course) 'cause most teachers do not know the first thing about educational hardware or software. I DO know what I want to be able to do one day in class. But the time it would take to teach every teacher about the available technologies could take forever...as Claudia wrote, there should be a group of people (Tech experts) that make the decision with a consensus from the entire staff.

Anonymous said...

Laura said... I do like what you said about the "cooks." All the administration, teachers, parents, etc are making decisions that maybe we are not ready to take on. I am not teaching as of yet and I don't know what I will have to work with when I go into a classroom. Will I have technology in the room? Will I have to take the kids to the lab? Lots of questions.